January 22, 2021
By Steve Blumenthal
“Bull markets are born on pessimism, grown on skepticism,
mature on optimism, and die on euphoria.”
– Sir John Templeton,
Investor, Mutual Fund Manager, Philanthropist
Euphoria is here…
I remember the call I received in early 2007. “Steve, it’s Mark. Are there any mortgage-backed securities in our portfolio? If so, get them out.” It was my good friend Mark Finn, who had several of his clients invested in a fund of hedge funds we managed.
“I don’t believe so,” I replied and told him I’d check with the portfolio team. He upped his tone, “Call me right back!”
A fund of funds is a strategy that invests in a number of unique single strategies. We incorporated some leverage and allocated to twenty different fund managers. We felt confident we could control the risk through diversification. We allocated to long/short managers, global macro managers, option arbitrage, convertible bond arbitrage, active trading, equity market neutral, and more. The overall idea was to find absolute return managers who could generate returns in different ways and blend them together in one fund.
I confirmed we had no mortgage exposure with my team, called Mark back, and asked bluntly, “Mark, what’s going on?”
If you’ve seen the movie The Big Short, you know the answer. Essentially, there was crazy amounts of liquidity packaged in the form of mortgage-backed securities, then repackaged into something called CDOs (collateralized debt obligations). Take the worst of the worst mortgages, repackage them, and sell them as a highly rated mortgage debt (loaded with no-doc mortgages collateralized by wildly overpriced houses owned by individuals with poor credit). Think of it as leverage on top of leverage that created the liquidity that inflated the housing bubble until it popped. It brought the banking system to its knees.
The circumstances of it all were visible to a few people, and Mark saw it early. I learned from Mark and wrote about it frequently back then in OMR. It led to the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. It turned out to be much worse than I imagined.
For me, one of the great joys of my job is talking to very smart people about the market. Mark’s at the top of my list. He’s a dear friend and mentor. In his early years, he chaired the Virginia Retirement System investment committee, and for many years his own consulting firm. In full disclosure, I’m invested in several of Mark’s venture capital funds and several of the companies those funds have spawned. That conflict is real—best to be up front with you.
This week, I had a chance to catch up with Mark. One of the private companies in his venture fund is conducting another round of funding, and I wanted to get a sense of timing and the ability to participate in the capital raise. But I also wanted to ask him his thoughts on the state of the market. With his permission, I share what we spoke about with you. In short, here’s what he said:
“Best guess, I expect two quarters of a surprising, good bull move, then trouble. For now, loosen the reins and enjoy it. But be careful: Momentum, high concentration (investors all in the same few stocks and index funds), and optimism are signaling a market top.
“Inflation is going to surprise to the upside and will scare some people. The Fed and the Government are all in. Stocks don’t struggle until inflation is north of 3%.” Mark sees inflation north of 3% six months from now. That might roil the bond market.
“Only when inflation gets north of 4% does it affect the stock market. That’s when P/E ratios compress.”
He concluded, “Nothing to do now but plan for trouble down the road. The trouble is the debt load. We keep papering over it and expect more of the same. Eventually the debt burden will catch up with us. Maybe in six months, maybe a year—but it’s coming. It’s the debt that is going to stop the party!”
Famed investor Jeremy Grantham was on CNBC yesterday, which reminded me to read his recent missive, “Waiting for the last dance.” I loved it and think it’s a must read for every advisor and every investor. It’s a well-written stroll through market bubble history by one of the great investors of our time. I share it with you in its entirety below (click on the orange On My Radar button if you are reading this in your inbox or simply scroll down if you are reading this online).
GMO puts out a 7-year Real Return Forecast, which I’ve been following since 1999. It has a pretty good track record of forecasting subsequent after-inflation returns. Not perfect but not to be ignored. Here is the most recent one:
In English, that’s -6.6% per year for seven years. That means a $100,000 investment in U.S. Large Cap stocks on January 1, 2021 will be worth approximately $62,005 on January 1, 2028. But keep in mind, the path to that destination will be tricky. $100,000 could go to $120,000 on its way down to $62,005. Ultimately, it’s the end destination that matters. Now is not the time to tell your advisor to up the risk. Instead, risk manage what you’ve got— especially if you are nearing or in retirement.
As Jeremy Grantham said, “The one reality that you can never change is that a higher-priced asset will produce a lower return than a lower-priced asset. You can’t have your cake and eat it. You can enjoy it now, or you can enjoy it steadily in the distant future, but not both—and the price we pay for having this market go higher and higher is a lower 10-year return from the peak.” Simple, logical, smart.
If it is early morning when you’re reading this week’s post, go grab that coffee, find your favorite chair, and read on. If it’s evening time, pour yourself a glass of fine red wine—maybe two… This week’s post packs a punch. And, as always, thank you for reading my posts each week. It is very much appreciated.
If a friend forwarded this email to you and you’d like to be on the weekly list, you can sign up to receive my free On My Radar letter here.
Included in this week’s On My Radar:
- Waiting for the Last Dance, by Jeremy Grantham
- Trade Signals – Biden, Powell, and Yellen (“Smartest Thing We Can Do is Act Big”)
- Personal Note – Fierce Conversations
The long, long bull market since 2009 has finally matured into a fully-fledged epic bubble. Featuring extreme overvaluation, explosive price increases, frenzied issuance, and hysterically speculative investor behavior, I believe this event will be recorded as one of the great bubbles of financial history, right along with the South Sea bubble, 1929, and 2000.
These great bubbles are where fortunes are made and lost – and where investors truly prove their mettle. For positioning a portfolio to avoid the worst pain of a major bubble breaking is likely the most difficult part. Every career incentive in the industry and every fault of individual human psychology will work toward sucking investors in.
But this bubble will burst in due time, no matter how hard the Fed tries to support it, with consequent damaging effects on the economy and on portfolios. Make no mistake – for the majority of investors today, this could very well be the most important event of your investing lives. Speaking as an old student and historian of markets, it is intellectually exciting and terrifying at the same time. It is a privilege to ride through a market like this one more time.
The one reality that you can never change is that a higher-priced asset will produce a lower return than a lower-priced asset. You can’t have your cake and eat it. You can enjoy it now, or you can enjoy it steadily in the distant future, but not both – and the price we pay for having this market go higher and higher is a lower 10-year return from the peak. [Footnote omitted.]
Most of the time, perhaps three-quarters of the time, major asset classes are reasonably priced relative to one another. The correct response is to make modest bets on those assets that measure as being cheaper and hope that the measurements are correct. With reasonable skill at evaluating assets the valuation-based allocator can expect to survive these phases intact with some small outperformance. “Small” because the opportunities themselves are small. If you wanted to be unfriendly you could say that asset allocation in this phase is unlikely to be very important. It would certainly help in these periods if the manager could also add value in the implementation, from the effective selection of countries, sectors, industries, and individual securities as well as major asset classes.
The real trouble with asset allocation, though, is in the remaining times when asset prices move far away from fair value. This is not so bad in bear markets because important bear markets tend to be short and brutal. The initial response of clients is usually to be shocked into inaction during which phase the manager has time to reposition both portfolio and arguments to retain the business. The real problem is in major bull markets that last for years. Long, slow-burning bull markets can spend many years above fair value and even two, three, or four years far above. These events can easily outlast the patience of most clients. And when price rises are very rapid, typically toward the end of a bull market, impatience is followed by anxiety and envy. As I like to say, there is nothing more supremely irritating than watching your neighbors get rich.
How are clients to tell the difference between extreme market behavior and a manager who has lost his way? The usual evidence of talent is past success, but the long cycles of the market are few and far between. Winning two out of two events or three out of three is not as convincing as a larger sample size would be. Even worse the earlier major market breaks are already long gone: 2008, 2000, or 1989 in Japan are practically in the history books. Most of the players will have changed. Certainly, the satisfaction felt by others who eventually won long ago is no solace for current pain experienced by you personally. A simpler way of saying this may be that if Keynes really had said, “The market can stay irrational longer than the investor can stay solvent,” he would have been right.
I am long retired from the job of portfolio management but I am happy to give my opinion here: it is highly probable that we are in a major bubble event in the U.S. market, of the type we typically have every several decades and last had in the late 1990s. It will very probably end badly, although nothing is certain. I will also tell you my definition of success for a bear market call. It is simply that sooner or later there will come a time when an investor is pleased to have been out of the market. That is to say, he will have saved money by being out, and also have reduced risk or volatility on the round trip. This definition of success absolutely does not include precise timing. (Predicting when a bubble breaks is not about valuation. All prior bubble markets have been extremely overvalued, as is this one. Overvaluation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for their bursting.) Calling the week, month, or quarter of the top is all but impossible.
I came fairly close to calling one bull market peak in 2008 and nailed a bear market low in early 2009 when I wrote “Reinvesting When Terrified.” That’s far more luck than I could hope for even over a 50-year career. Far more typically, I was three years too early in the Japan bubble. We at GMO got entirely out of Japan in 1987, when it was over 40% of the EAFE benchmark and selling at over 40x earnings, against a previous all-time high of 25x. It seemed prudent to exit at the time, but for three years we underperformed painfully as the Japanese market went to 65x earnings on its way to becoming over 60% of the benchmark! But we also stayed completely out for three years after the top and ultimately made good money on the round trip.
Similarly, in late 1997, as the S&P 500 passed its previous 1929 peak of 21x earnings, we rapidly sold down our discretionary U.S. equity positions then watched in horror as the market went to 35x on rising earnings. We lost half our Asset Allocation book of business but in the ensuing decline we much more than made up our losses.
Believe me, I know these are old stories. But they are directly relevant. For this current market event is indeed the same old story. This summer, I said it was likely that we were in the later stages of a bubble, with some doubt created by the unique features of the COVID crash. The single most dependable feature of the late stages of the great bubbles of history has been really crazy investor behavior, especially on the part of individuals. For the first 10 years of this bull market, which is the longest in history, we lacked such wild speculation. But now we have it. In record amounts. My colleagues Ben Inker and John Pease have written about some of these examples of mania in the most recent GMO Quarterly Letter, including Hertz, Kodak, Nikola, and, especially, Tesla. As a Model 3 owner, my personal favorite Tesla tidbit is that its market cap, now over $600 billion, amounts to over $1.25 million per car sold each year versus $9,000 per car for GM. What has 1929 got to equal that? Any of these tidbits could perhaps be dismissed as isolated cases (trust me: they are not), but big-picture metrics look even worse.
The “Buffett indicator,” total stock market capitalization to GDP, broke through its all-time-high 2000 record. In 2020, there were 480 IPOs (including an incredible 248 SPACs [footnote omitted] ) – more new listings than the 406 IPOs in 2000. There are 150 non-micro-cap companies (that is, with market capitalization of over $250 million) that have more than tripled in the year, which is over 3 times as many as any year in the previous decade. The volume of small retail purchases, of less than 10 contracts, of call options on U.S. equities has increased 8-fold compared to 2019, and 2019 was already well above long-run average. Perhaps most troubling of all: Nobel laureate and long-time bear Robert Shiller – who correctly and bravely called the 2000 and 2007 bubbles and who is one of the very few economists I respect – is hedging his bets this time, recently making the point that his legendary CAPE asset-pricing indicator (which suggests stocks are nearly as overpriced as at the 2000 bubble peak) shows less impressive overvaluation when compared to bonds. Bonds, however, are even more spectacularly expensive by historical comparison than stocks. Oh my!
So, I am not at all surprised that since the summer the market has advanced at an accelerating rate and with increasing speculative excesses. It is precisely what you should expect from a late-stage bubble: an accelerating, nearly vertical stage of unknowable length – but typically short. Even if it is short, this stage at the end of a bubble is shockingly painful and full of career risk for bears.
I am doubling down, because as prices move further away from trend, at accelerating speed and with growing speculative fervor, of course my confidence as a market historian increases that this is indeed the late stage of a bubble. A bubble that is beginning to look like a real humdinger.
The strangest feature of this bull market is how unlike every previous great bubble it is in one respect. Previous bubbles have combined accommodative monetary conditions with economic conditions that are perceived at the time, rightly or wrongly, as near perfect, which perfection is extrapolated into the indefinite future. The state of economic excellence of any previous bubble of course did not last long, but if it could have lasted, then the market would justifiably have sold at a huge multiple of book. But today’s wounded economy is totally different: only partly recovered, possibly facing a double-dip, probably facing a slowdown, and certainly facing a very high degree of uncertainty. Yet the market is much higher today than it was last fall when the economy looked fine and unemployment was at a historic low. Today the P/E ratio of the market is in the top few percent of the historical range and the economy is in the worst few percent. This is completely without precedent and may even be a better measure of speculative intensity than any SPAC.
This time, more than in any previous bubble, investors are relying on accommodative monetary conditions and zero real rates extrapolated indefinitely. This has in theory a similar effect to assuming peak economic performance forever: it can be used to justify much lower yields on all assets and therefore correspondingly higher asset prices. But neither perfect economic conditions nor perfect financial conditions can last forever, and there’s the rub.
All bubbles end with near universal acceptance that the current one will not end yet…because. Because in 1929 the economy had clicked into “a permanently high plateau”; because Greenspan’s Fed in 2000 was predicting an enduring improvement in productivity and was pledging its loyalty (or moral hazard) to the stock market; because Bernanke believed in 2006 that “U.S. house prices merely reflect a strong U.S. economy” as he perpetuated the moral hazard: if you win you’re on your own, but if you lose you can count on our support. Yellen, and now Powell, maintained this approach. All three of Powell’s predecessors claimed that the asset prices they helped inflate in turn aided the economy through the wealth effect. Which effect we all admit is real. But all three avoided claiming credit for the ensuing market breaks that inevitably followed: the equity bust of 2000 and the housing bust of 2008, each replete with the accompanying anti-wealth effect that came when we least needed it, exaggerating the already guaranteed weakness in the economy. This game surely is the ultimate deal with the devil.
Now once again the high prices this time will hold because…interest rates will be kept around nil forever, in the ultimate statement of moral hazard – the asymmetrical market risk we have come to know and depend on. The mantra of late 2020 was that engineered low rates can prevent a decline in asset prices. Forever! But of course, it was a fallacy in 2000 and it is a fallacy now. In the end, moral hazard did not stop the Tech bubble decline, with the NASDAQ falling 82%. Yes, 82%! Nor, in 2008, did it stop U.S. housing prices declining all the way back to trend and below – which in turn guaranteed first, a shocking loss of over eight trillion dollars of perceived value in housing; second, an ensuing weakness in the economy; and third, a broad rise in risk premia and a broad decline in global asset prices (see Exhibit 1). All the promises were in the end worth nothing, except for one; the Fed did what it could to pick up the pieces and help the markets get into stride for the next round of enhanced prices and ensuing decline. And here we are again, waiting for the last dance and, eventually, for the music to stop.
Nothing in investing perfectly repeats. Certainly not investment bubbles. Each form of irrational exuberance is different; we are just looking for what you might call spiritual similarities. Even now, I know that this market can soar upwards for a few more weeks or even months – it feels like we could be anywhere between July 1999 and February 2000. Which is to say it is entitled to break any day, having checked all the boxes, but could keep roaring upwards for a few months longer. My best guess as to the longest this bubble might survive is the late spring or early summer, coinciding with the broad rollout of the COVID vaccine. At that moment, the most pressing issue facing the world economy will have been solved. Market participants will breathe a sigh of relief, look around, and immediately realize that the economy is still in poor shape, stimulus will shortly be cut back with the end of the COVID crisis, and valuations are absurd. “Buy the rumor, sell the news.” But remember that timing the bursting of bubbles has a long history of disappointment.
Even with hindsight, it is seldom easy to point to the pin that burst the bubble. The main reason for this lack of clarity is that the great bull markets did not break when they were presented with a major unexpected negative. Those events, like the portfolio insurance fiasco of 1987, tend to give sharp down legs and quick recoveries. They are in the larger scheme of things unique and technical and are not part of the ebb and flow of the great bubbles. The great bull markets typically turn down when the market conditions are very favorable, just subtly less favorable than they were yesterday. And that is why they are always missed.
Either way, the market is now checking off all the touchy-feely characteristics of a major bubble. The most impressive features are the intensity and enthusiasm of bulls, the breadth of coverage of stocks and the market, and, above all, the rising hostility toward bears. In 1929, to be a bear was to risk physical attack and guarantee character assassination. For us, 1999 was the only experience we have had of clients reacting as if we were deliberately and maliciously depriving them of gains. In comparison, 2008 was nothing. But in the last few months the hostile tone has been rapidly ratcheting up. The irony for bears though is that it’s exactly what we want to hear. It’s a classic precursor of the ultimate break; together with stocks rising, not for their fundamentals, but simply because they are rising.
Another more measurable feature of a late-stage bull, from the South Sea bubble to the Tech bubble of 1999, has been an acceleration [footnote omitted] of the final leg, which in recent cases has been over 60% in the last 21 months to the peak, a rate well over twice the normal rate of bull market ascents. This time, the U.S. indices have advanced from +69% for the S&P 500 to +100% for the Russell 2000 in just 9 months. Not bad! And there may still be more climbing to come. But it has already met this necessary test of a late-stage bubble.
It is a privilege as a market historian to experience a major stock bubble once again. Japan in 1989, the 2000 Tech bubble, the 2008 housing and mortgage crisis, and now the current bubble – these are the four most significant and gripping investment events of my life. Most of the time in more normal markets you show up for work and do your job. Ho hum. And then, once in a long while, the market spirals away from fair value and reality. Fortunes are made and lost in a hurry and investment advisors have a rare chance to really justify their existence. But, as usual, there is no free lunch. These opportunities to be useful come loaded with career risk.
So, here we are again. I expect once again for my bubble call to meet my modest definition of success: at some future date, whenever that may be, it will have paid for you to have ducked from midsummer of 2020. But few professional or individual investors will have been able to have ducked. The combination of timing uncertainty and rapidly accelerating regret on the part of clients means that the career and business risk of fighting the bubble is too great for large commercial enterprises. They can never put their full weight behind bearish advice even if the P/E goes to 65x as it did in Japan. The nearest any of these giant institutions have ever come to offering fully bearish advice in a bubble was UBS in 1999, whose position was nearly identical to ours at GMO. That is to say, somewhere between brave and foolhardy. Luckily for us though, they changed their tack and converted to a fully invested growth stock recommendation at UBS Brinson and its subsidiary, Phillips & Drew, in February 2000, just before the market peak. This took out the 800-pound gorilla that would otherwise have taken most of the rewards for stubborn contrariness. So, don’t wait for the Goldmans and Morgan Stanleys to become bearish: it can never happen. For them it is a horribly non-commercial bet. Perhaps it is for anyone. Profitable and risk-reducing for the clients, yes, but commercially impractical for advisors. Their best policy is clear and simple: always be extremely bullish. It is good for business and intellectually undemanding. It is appealing to most investors who much prefer optimism to realistic appraisal, as witnessed so vividly with COVID. And when it all ends, you will as a persistent bull have overwhelming company. This is why you have always had bullish advice in a bubble and always will.
However, for any manager willing to take on that career risk – or more likely for the individual investor – requiring that you get the timing right is overreach. If the hurdle for calling a bubble is set too high, so that you must call the top precisely, you will never try. And that condemns you to ride over the cliff every cycle, along with the great majority of investors and managers.
What to Do?
As often happens at bubbly peaks like 1929, 2000, and the Nifty Fifty of 1972 (a second-tier bubble in the company of champions), today’s market features extreme disparities in value by asset class, sector, and company. Those at the very cheap end include traditional value stocks all over the world, relative to growth stocks. Value stocks have had their worst-ever relative decade ending December 2019, followed by the worst-ever year in 2020, with spreads between Growth and Value performance averaging between 20 and 30 percentage points for the single year! Similarly, Emerging Market equities are at 1 of their 3, more or less co-equal, relative lows against the U.S. of the last 50 years. Not surprisingly, we believe it is in the overlap of these two ideas, Value and Emerging, that your relative bets should go, along with the greatest avoidance of U.S. Growth stocks that your career and business risk will allow. Good luck!
January 20, 2021
S&P 500 Index — 3,798 (close)
Notable this week:
“Neither the president-elect nor I, propose this relief package without an appreciation
for the country’s debt burden. But right now, with interest rates at historic lows,
the smartest thing we can do is act big.”
– Janet Yellen
The bullish trend in equities continues and the participation is broad as measured by weekly new highs vs. new lows. The Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat indicator continues to signal a healthy up trend. The Zweig Bond Model remains in a sell signal (bearish for high grade bonds and bond funds). High yield bond prices remain in a bullish up trend. We remain bullish on gold.
Bullish investor sentiment remains extreme. Supporting that view is Janet Yellen’s remark that, “… the smartest thing we can do is act big.” Best guess is “act big” means further stock market advance. Ultimately, debt is and will be the issue and any rising inflation will lead to higher interest rates and is a bad recipe for bonds.
Dr. Lacy Hunt and his partner Van Hoisington released their quarterly letter this week. I’ll share more with you in next Friday’s On My Radar, but here is their bottom line for now,
“Since the US Treasury effectively has no credit risk, inflation is the main determinant of long-term Treasury rates. The Treasury bull market will therefore continue until we see a secular inflation cycle, which is not presently at hand.”
Not presently at hand. It’s never good to argue with Lacy. Let’s keep a close eye on the above inflation signal chart. We may be entering the early innings of inflation.
Not a recommendation for you to buy or sell any security. For information purposes only. Please talk with your advisor about needs, goals, time horizon and risk tolerances.
Click here for this week’s Trade Signals.
“While no single conversation is guaranteed to change the trajectory
of a career, a company, a relationship, or a life, any single conversation can.”
– Fierce Conversations: Achieving Success at Work and in Life,
One Conversation at a Time, by Susan Scott
My wife Susan is reading a book called Fierce Conversations. If you are a TED Talk fan, Scott did a presentation on “The Case for Radical Transparency.” Worth the listen. Put your sneakers on, pop in those ear buds, and go for a twenty-minute walk.
The forward of Scott’s book is written by Ken Blanchard. You may have read a book he co-authored titled, The One Minute Manager, or any of the 59 others he has written or co-written. In 2005, Ken was inducted into Amazon’s Hall of Fame as one of the top 25 best-selling authors of all time.
Blanchard summarizes what he calls the “essence of this powerful book: Our lives succeed or fail gradually, then suddenly, one conversation at a time. While no single conversation is guaranteed to change trajectory of a career, a business, a marriage, or a life, any single conversation can. The conversation is the relationship.” The book is about making every conversation count.
Honestly, top of mind are a few conversations that I really regret. Wishing I handled differently. My plan is to read the book this weekend. Susan loves it, so I’m all in. And dare I say I should’ve read it before the fierce conversation I’m about to start with you.
Here goes: Finn is right; Grantham is right. The bubble of all equity bubbles is in the equity market. Everyone is buying into the same few stocks. Just six stocks accounted for 14% of the 18% return in the S&P 500 Index in 2020. Microsoft was one of the popular names in 1999. It took fifteen years for it to get back to even. This is where we find ourselves today. This is insane.
The bubble is in tech and in passive equity indices. Perhaps the greatest bubble of all time is in the bond market. The problem is debt. Debt is leverage. Leverage unwinds badly when liquidity dries up. Leverage is risk.
Everything happens faster today. I believe it is due to the speed and accessibility of information. So, I suspect that when inflation gets out of the bag—as it is starting to do—it will surprise to the upside faster than most people think.
We are closer to inflation than people think. Higher interest rates will follow, and the level of debt won’t be able to handle the increased cost. We are at Euphoria.
If you hold the view that the Fed is so powerful that it won’t let the market fall, I advise caution. A couple of my Camp Kotok fishing friends, Jim Bianco and Danielle DiMartino Booth, were on a podcast that was picked up in a piece written by Axios’ Dion Rabouin last Tuesday. It reads:
Even though Fed chair Jerome Powell and other top officials have said they welcome inflation, Bianco warns they are not in charge.
“If you look at the policy shifts from the Fed … the last two times the Fed has changed policy the market has forced it on them and forced it on them rather quickly,” he added.
The Fed “can lay out all the plans in the world that they want as long as the market is in agreement with them. But if the market ever changes its mind the Fed is within days of changing policy.”
Danielle DiMartino Booth, CEO of Quill Intelligence added,
“What happens to housing and everything that we’ve poured into housing if mortgage rates come off their record lows?” (DiMartino Booth, a former staffer at the Fed, told me on the Voices of Wall Street podcast).
“I think that’s the last thing that Jay Powell wants. Especially if you’re looking at what happens to risky assets because the world is not prepared for higher interest rates.”
“The Fed should be extremely careful of saying that it wants inflation … once the genie gets let out of the bottle the Fed’s not going to have a say in where inflation goes and I don’t think policymakers understand that.”
Mark Finn is spot on: “It is the debt that is going to stop the party.”
In my fierce conversation with you today, I’m ringing the bell. Gutsy? Stupid? Maybe. But it is too important not to point out what is so crystal clear:
We’ve reached a market top. It’s time to act.
Put risk protection in place now while the cost of that protection is cheap. Consider rotating to value plays like high and growing dividend stocks and buying put options to protect from the minus 50% that is likely in our near future. And completely rethink what you are doing with bonds. You can find well collateralized short-term private credit yielding high single digits.
If I’m wrong, the small percent of insurance cost will be money well spent.
Next week I’ll share a few ideas on how to utilize equity index options to hedge equity exposure.
To that end, I’m going to do a podcast with one of the smartest option traders I know. Options are one way to hedge. We’ll talk about what to use and how to size the protection. I’ll provide a link to the podcast in next week’s OMR post.
Stay safe, stay well… and don’t worry. We’ve been here before and we got through the last crisis. Let’s just get through the next one in good shape.
Wishing you a great week.
Stephen B. Blumenthal
Executive Chairman & CIO
CMG Capital Management Group, Inc.
Consider buying my newly published Forbes Book, described as follows:
With On My Radar, Stephen Blumenthal gives investors a game plan and the advice they need to develop a risk-minded and opportunity-based investment approach. It is about how to grow and defend your wealth.
If you are interested in the book, you can learn more here.
Stephen Blumenthal founded CMG Capital Management Group in 1992 and serves today as its Executive Chairman and CIO. Steve authors a free weekly e-letter entitled, “On My Radar.” Steve shares his views on macroeconomic research, valuations, portfolio construction, asset allocation and risk management.
Click here to receive his free weekly e-letter.
Follow Steve on Twitter @SBlumenthalCMG and LinkedIn.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
Investing involves risk. Past performance does not guarantee or indicate future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by CMG Capital Management Group, Inc. or any of its related entities (collectively “CMG”) will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. No portion of the content should be construed as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. References to specific securities, investment programs or funds are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities.
Certain portions of the content may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, opinions and/or recommendations of CMG (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current recommendations or opinions. Derivatives and options strategies are not suitable for every investor, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained herein serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CMG or the professional advisors of your choosing. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisors of his/her choosing. CMG is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.
This presentation does not discuss, directly or indirectly, the amount of the profits or losses, realized or unrealized, by any CMG client from any specific funds or securities. Please note: In the event that CMG references performance results for an actual CMG portfolio, the results are reported net of advisory fees and inclusive of dividends. The performance referenced is that as determined and/or provided directly by the referenced funds and/or publishers, have not been independently verified, and do not reflect the performance of any specific CMG client. CMG clients may have experienced materially different performance based upon various factors during the corresponding time periods. See in links provided citing limitations of hypothetical back-tested information. Past performance cannot predict or guarantee future performance. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Please talk to your advisor.
Information herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its accuracy. This document is a general communication and is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only. None of the content should be viewed as a suggestion that you take or refrain from taking any action nor as a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, or other such purpose.
In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed income securities generally declines and conversely, in a falling interest rate environment, the value of fixed income securities generally increases. High-yield securities may be subject to heightened market, interest rate or credit risk and should not be purchased solely because of the stated yield. Ratings are measured on a scale that ranges from AAA or Aaa (highest) to D or C (lowest). Investment-grade investments are those rated from highest down to BBB- or Baa3.
NOT FDIC INSURED. MAY LOSE VALUE. NO BANK GUARANTEE.
Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
In the event that there has been a change in an individual’s investment objective or financial situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with his/her investment professional.
Written Disclosure Statement. CMG is an SEC-registered investment adviser located in Malvern, Pennsylvania. Stephen B. Blumenthal is CMG’s founder and CEO. Please note: The above views are those of CMG and its CEO, Stephen Blumenthal, and do not reflect those of any sub-advisor that CMG may engage to manage any CMG strategy, or exclusively determines any internal strategy employed by CMG. A copy of CMG’s current written disclosure statement discussing advisory services and fees is available upon request or via CMG’s internet web site at www.cmgwealth.com/disclosures. CMG is committed to protecting your personal information. Click here to review CMG’s privacy policies.